wwwvl.gif The World-Wide Web Virtual Library
[Alphabetical || Category Subtree || WWW VL database|| WWW VL Global Search]


Moderating Scholarly Asian Studies E-Forum

Created: 23 Dec 1997. Last updated: 10 May 1999.

Edited by Dr T.Matthew Ciolek

This document is a part of the Asian Studies WWW VL


|| Search Asian Studies WWW VL||
|| Asian Studies Home Page || Global Resources || Regional Resources || Country Resources || About the AS WWW VL Project || Editors of the AS WWW VL || Associates of the AS WWW VL || Seven Golden Rules Moderating Asian Studies E-Forum || Contents' Rating || Acknowledgements & Awards || Register New Resources || Send Feedback & Corrections ||

This page is no longer maintained. However it is kept online for archival purposes. 6 Dec 2001. tmc.

The Gentle Art of Managing a scholarly electronic forum:
Notes for the Moderators of

CENTRAL-ASIA-STUDIES-L@COOMBS.ANU.EDU.AU
SOUTH-ASIA-STUDIES-L@COOMBS.ANU.EDU.AU
TIBETAN-STUDIES-L@COOMBS.ANU.EDU.AU

From July 1993 onwards the experience with the flow information across these specialist electronic agoras has demonstrated that e-mail discussion groups, as channels of communication, are NOT self-regulating systems. Their charters, no matter how carefully drafted, and no matter how often reiterated, tend to be ignored by some of the subscribers and, as the result, the lists periodicaly find themselves afflicted by a misuse and aggrevations.

The misuse can take several forms - the forums get monopolised by very vocal individuals who crowd other information out; they are frequently treated as a private verbal playground or an electronic grafitti wall; or are used as an outlet for plentiful but irrelevant messages, including commercial spams; and even are made into battlegrounds for tender but very opinionated egos etc etc.

Since the repeated Listowner's appeals to the sense and sensibilities of the 'transgressors' most of the times tended to be ineffective, from the 1 December 1997 the electronic fora operating from MAJORDOMO@COOMBS.ANU.EDU.AU address were turned into a moderated lists, that is lists where all messages to the List are inspected, tidied up and approved by a moderator before they reach the wider community of subscribers.

The current team of moderators for our set of lists comprises (in alphabetic order):

Moderation of a mailing list is a gentle and necessarily imperfect art. It requires careful balancing and adjustements between three rather incompatible variables:

  1. the integrity of the raison d'etre of the electronic forum itself - the list needs to remain pertinent, coherent and elegant;
  2. the integrity of messages written by the subscribers to the list - the original messages need to be as little censored/edited/annotated as possible;
  3. the need to minimise amount of time a moderator spends on managament of the intellectual traffic on this list - the moderation has to be as as simple and as quick as possible;

The following notes (may I have your suggestions for improvements, please ?) are an attempt to establish a balance between these three sets of conflicting considerations: